As the struggle against marriage apartheid took center stage in New York this weekend, Libertarians lauded the progress America has made in the last year — and urged the federal government to roll back legal barriers blocking full recognition of same-sex marriage.
“Six states have already ended the practice of discriminating against gay couples seeking to marry,” says George Phillies, past chair of the Libertarian Party of Massachusetts and editor of Liberty for America magazine. “The trend is clear and unstoppable — within a few years, almost every state will adopt similar policies. It’s time for the federal government to catch up with the American people.”
Same-sex couples face numerous federal policies of discrimination, ranging from the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy to gender-based tax penalties. The Defense of Marriage Act, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by Democrat Bill Clinton, denies federal recognition to same-sex marriages. The Libertarian Party’s platform calls for change, asserting that “[s]exual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the rights of individuals by government, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.”
“My gay clients, even those in states that permit same-sex marriage, pay higher federal income taxes,” says Less Antman, a CPA and former Libertarian Party candidate for State Treasurer of California. “They can’t freely mix assets without risking a violation of US gift tax laws, they’re limited in their ability to inherit from each other tax-free, they’re subjected to immigration restrictions not applied to heterosexual couples, and if they move to another state they may even find their marriages legally nullified.”
“As the fight for marriage freedom proceeds in the states, it’s imperative that we repeal DOMA and enforce the Constitution’s full faith and credit clause to protect the marriages of those who travel or relocate across the nation,” says Phillies. “It’s time for Washington, DC to get radically pro-family.”
Contact: Thomas L. Knapp | media@clipr.info | 314-721-3960
PRLog release version w/PDF: Click here








Frankly, I think it would be best if the government just got out of the marriage business, period. Why do I need some state certificate to validate my union with my spouse? There shouldn't be any tax penalty for not being "married", and there shouldn't be any tax benefit for the contrary.
This is easily my favorite hypocrisy from the neo-conservatives that now prevail the GOP, and the social conservatives who call themselves Democrats. They act as leading advocates for individual responsibility and freedom, yet if you don't walk, talk, and behave just like THEM, the equal rights and liberty they speak of does not apply.
Posted by: John Charles Smith | Tuesday, June 02, 2009 at 13:08